Archive for January, 2010

Gaza Footnotes: Joe Sacco, my mom, and the 1956 Khanyounis/Rafah Massacres

Laila El-Haddad - I recently had
the opportunity to interview cartoonist Joe Sacco about his latest work,
Footnotes in Gaza,
for Aljazeera English. The book is an
investigation into two little-known massacres in the 1956 Gaza Strip. I say
little-known because there is little record of these two tragedies outside of a
short UN document and local eyewitness testimony.

Now, the
subject war near and dear to my heart, as I disclose in my first question to
him in the interview because my mother was a survivor and
witness to those events in Khanyounis (her home town). She was eleven at the
time, and I grew up with non sequitur details of what occurred that day-from
the harrowing (mass executions) to the hilarious (my mother’s jokester of a
cousin who-while awaiting imminent execution-asked his neighbor “what do you
think they’re going to do to us??” (the reply: Make us dance-what do you
think!!); My Aunt, who showed the soldiers about to execute her only son a coat
she has purchased in Tel Aviv in hopes they would spare his life (it was, but
only because a cease fire was declared)), never quite making sense of it all.
;Wasn’t 1948 was the really important date, I thought? And didn’t the Israelis
occupy Gaza in
1967, so what were they doing there in 1956? And why haven’t I read about this
anywhere?

“I can’t
forget Ahmed Bitar-the newlywed they executed just outside the shelter we were
staying in because he pleaded for mercy with his pregnant wife; or the
bodies-all those bodies soaking in their own pools of blood along the castle
wall in the town center; of my baby sister Mona, who couldn’t stop crying
because she lost her pacifier,” she kept telling me.

And so when I
came across Sacco’s book, I was thrilled-in whatever odd way one can be
thrilled when reading about massacres…to discover that someone had finally
bothered to investigate these incidents. I poured through the books pages one
after another. I even showed some to my mother-she recognized many of the faces
immediately.

“This is not
something you can just forget or [say] ‘let’s move on’ [about]. It has to be acknowledged,
it has to be talked about. History has to be written not just by the victors,
but by the people being victimized” Joe said to me in the interview.

Afterward, he
a request of me: that when the interview goes live, I re-link it here along
with testimony from my mother. Well here it is that testimony, following by an
exclusive excerpt from the book.

 

Cross-posted from Gaza Mom blog with the author’s permission.

IDF joins assault on Israeli human rights community

As international
pressure mounts on Israel
the government assault on civil society is reaching new lows.  Now it appears that the
 IDF and GSS [Shin Bet] are working in tandem with Im Tirzu, which over
the weekend launched an unprecedented campaign reminiscent of Der Sturmer,against
Prof. Naomi Chazan, President of the the New Israel fund. Here’s an
excerpt from a report by Ben Caspit on Maariv’s website
this morning.

Now it turns out that the materials exposed on the weekend are familiar to the IDF authorities and the legal authorities in Israel. Some of them were given half a year ago to the Military Advocate General Brig. Gen. Avichai Mandelblit. He checked the material and gave it to the Atty. Gen., with a recommendation to open an official investigation. No such investigation has been made so far. The Israel Security Agency [Shin Bet; GSS] is also familiar with the material and the sensitive issue. Taking action against this is not simple because NIF is a registered association in the US. Also, it is noteworthy that a large part of the fund’s activities in Israel are devoted to social and public issues of the first order.

“It will be hard to connect this activity to political subversion,” said a security source, who is well familiar with the affair. “But on the other hand, there is clearly a worrisome pattern here that is causing Israel serious damage and helping its worst critics tie the IDF’s hands and undermine the legitimacy of the Jewish state in general and its right to defend itself in particular.”
Im Tirtzu is now planning to launch a large public campaign, both against the New Israel Fund in general and personally against its head, Prof. Naomi Hazan. Dozens of movement activists demonstrated last night in front of Hazan’s house dressed up as Hamas activists and carryied signs thanking Hazan and the fund. As far as we know Hazan herself is presently in the U.S.

This piece was originally published on Coteret 

Haiti disaster shows Jews’ mettle

For those who are focused on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, any important world event seems related. This time it is the humanitarian disaster in Haiti.  An e-mail message from a colleague touted the work of an Israeli hospital team set up to assist Haitians with their acute medical needs, while pointing out the disappointingly poor response to the crisis exhibited by Arab countries of great wealth. At the same time, another website pointed to the irony of Israeli actions in Haiti thousands of miles away, while just a few hundreds of meters away Palestinians suffer.

The rapidity with which tiny, little Israel sent a medical team-an entire mobile medical hospital-to help Haitians is clear evidence of the resolve, capability and can-do spirit of Israeli Jews. The provision of this service to Haiti in her time of need is no publicity stunt; it is simply a reflection of Jewish moral fiber, of commitment to charity, to service to others, and to universal caring for Jews and non-Jews alike.

This is the true character of Judaism and of Jewish people. It is the calling of the Jewish people, a people who consider ourselves chosen to be a beacon to the nations. In so many ways, Israeli Jews, and Jews worldwide, are good role models.  Sadly, though, our moral character did not carry the day in our relationship with Christian and Muslim Palestinians. 

While Jews across the globe are rightly proud of the many amazing accomplishments of the State of Israel, founding a State of Israel at the expense of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians was inconsistent with Jewish moral principles. The violent expulsion of entire villages of Palestinian men, women and children-documented by Israeli historians but a history seemingly rarely taught in Jewish schooling- was a violation of the true spirit of Judaism. The destruction of Palestinian villages and the continued use of force to keep Palestinian families from returning to their homes are entirely inconsistent with Jewish moral character.

The mistreatment of Palestinian people by Jews was not caused by Jewish hatred of Arabs or by some Jewish plot to rule the land from the Nile to the Euphrates, as some would accuse. Scarred by the Holocaust, Jews hope only for peace and acted defensively and selfishly when we created a state for ourselves at the expense of others. Our actions were not only inconsistent with our principles, but in violating our cherished principles we sowed the seeds for even more hatred of and violence toward Jewish people.

Israel’s true nature is evident during Haiti’s crisis. Knowing the true nature of the Jewish people-warm, friendly, charitable, industrious, and religious- I am certain that the day will soon come when we will reach out to our Palestinian brothers and sisters, ask their forgiveness, and ask them to return to our shared country to rebuild their homes and villages and live together in peace. Knowing the true nature of Christian and Muslim Palestinians, the rejoining of these people will create a country of even greater accomplishments and moral leadership, a country that truly is a light of peace to the nations of the world.

 Feldman is author of Compartments: How the Brightest, Best Trained, and Most Caring People Can Make Judgments That are Completely and Utterly Wrong (www.compartmentsbook.com).  He is also author of A Jewish American’s Evolving View of Israel (http://www.acjna.org/acjna/articles_detail.aspx?id=529).

"To Shoot an Elephant" gives an insight into Gaza war and its horrors

Lina Al-Sharif - It was the mere chance that led me to discover this

documentary. I read an interview, published on the American- based site
Electronic Intifada with journalist/director Alberto Arce, who was in Gaza during the war.

The moment I finished reading interview, I started searching
for more information about it. After couple of weeks, I was able to download
the documentary, and I was planning to watch it on the 18th of January to be
part of the global screening, but I got busy with exams. So I saw it before
that date.

 



The two-hour documentary begins on December 25 when the siege was tighter than anytime before. The UN announced that its
depots were closed, and they couldn’t continue their missions in Gaze due to
the siege.  Moreover, there was a severe
shortage of flour that made Gazans wait for hours in queues in front of
bakeries to get their share of bread. Then, it moves the viewer to the horrors
of the war.

As I did live the war on Gaza, my recollection of it is related to
what I heard not what I saw. Watching “To Shoot an Elephant” was more of seeing
what I heard.

The documentary was hard to watch, because it was very real,
very raw, and very silent. There were many scenes when I just burst in tears, others
when I was horrified, and others when I was very angry.

Alberto Arce calls the documentary “an eyewitness” and it is
pretty much so, because the editing didn’t include any narration, music, or
anything.

The importance of this documentary lies in how it exposes
the atrocities occurred. The accusations of being biased would be refuted by
every scene in the film. Whether it is the account of paramedics who were shot
to evacuate a body or the burning white phosphorus in a house of a civilian, all
these and more just confirm that war crimes were committed not just during the
war, but even before and after.

What still impresses me, though, is that the internationals
who were in Gaza were given the chance to leave,
but they preferred to risk their necks to show the truth when Israel was
denying access to any international journalist.
It is indeed inspiring and promising to see such models of non-Palestinians
who use their own freedom to stand up by us in way that put their lives at
stake.

I recommend each one to watch this documentary. It gives you
a deep insight into the war on Gaza
and its horrors.

More information:

http://toshootanelephant.com/sites/default/press/english_dossier.pdf

Global screening :

http://community.toshootanelephant.com/

Watch online:

http://toshootanelephant.com/

On Youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/user/kadaveri

 

Cross-posted from Live From Gaza blog with the author’s permission.


 

A dark lining in every silver cloud

 

There were no suicide bombings in Israel in 2009.
That doesn’t mean no one was killed. Media reports, including in The Jerusalem Post, note that five Israelis were killed in Israel and the West Bank
last year. About 49 Israelis were wounded in attacks, not including those
injured during Operation Cast Lead at the beginning of last year.

I am surprised, though, that Israelis didn’t give
all the credit to the wall, which they call a fence, even though in reality it
is a “wall” where it is around people and a “fence” where it is around farmland
and open space.

Instead, some give credit for the lower casualties
and deaths to war in the Gaza Strip. Others say it’s because of better security
and the ability to prevent Palestinians from arming themselves. The focus is on
the perpetrators, not those engaged in peace.

How about giving some credit to the majority of
Palestinians who didn’t engage in violence, who didn’t engage in protests and
who watch Israel’s
government continue its policies of expanding the settlements in the West Bank
and around Jerusalem,
including on my land just north of Gilo?

During the same period, there were many Israeli
assaults, mostly by the military and some by the settlers, against
Palestinians. According to The Washington Post, 27 Palestinians were killed
in “conflict related violence,” down by half from 2008. That doesn’t include
the more than 1,000 killed during the war in Gaza.

It has become kind of an industry in Israel and Palestine.
I mean, of course, not the killings, but tabulating death tolls from violence.
It says something that it is easier to find out how many Israelis and
Palestinians were killed by each other than in car accidents or suicide.

It’s almost like dying from natural causes or
accidents doesn’t matter as much.

The Gaza Strip isn’t occupied by Israel any more,
although it is certainly controlled by Israel, with the help of Egypt – I’m not
sure if that is better than it would be if it were reversed and the Egyptians
controlled Gaza with Israel’s help.

But the West Bank and east Jerusalem are, and that’s where my focus is.
Why can’t we say the reduction in violence is a result of improved relations?
That we are starting to hate each other less?

Why isn’t that reduction in violence an impetus
for both sides to ramp-up (an American corporate term that has nothing to do
with building Israelis-only roads in the West Bank, by the way) peace talks?

Doesn’t anyone believe that if peace talks resume
in earnest, there will be even fewer deaths? “Earnest” means Palestinians speak
genuinely about peace and out loud against the violence, and Israelis stop
advocating settlement expansion and start looking at shutting some down while
easing restrictions.

Is it too much to believe that peace generates
more peace? And that peace is the better “wall” or the better “fence,”
depending on which side of the conflict you stand?

I own 33 dunams of land next to Gilo near the
Muslim village of Sharafat, the “Tarud” land (one of my mother’s
families from Bethlehem).
The Israelis are planning to confiscate it and build new homes.

I won’t resort to violence, although I bet many
others would if it was their land being taken. I will go to the courts and
fight and demand that everyone who buys or takes a home there be sued. The
court system is where much of this conflict should be taken, not to a violent
battlefield.

But I understand that it’s easier to do things in
the face of violence than it is in the face of peace. The unknown investors in Jerusalem who are licking
their chops at profiting from my land want it this way. The violence allows
them to continue to take and profit.

I know the extremists among the Palestinians also
are licking their chops knowing that although they speak out against the land
confiscations and settlement expansions, those actions give them perceived
public approval to engage in more violence against Israel.

Imagine if the land confiscations ended, and the settlements were really frozen, that peace talks
could blossom and even fewer people will die. Wouldn’t it be nice if next year,
we read stories that reports no Israelis and no Palestinians were killed? Peace
talks increased?

That’s the silver lining in the dark clouds above
our lives today. We can have that, or we can continue to look for the usual
dark linings in the rare silver clouds.

In the meantime, if you know of a good lawyer who
doesn’t mind representing Palestinian rights in lands controlled by Israel, have
them give me a call. I won’t engage in violence, encourage violence or enable
violence to achieve my rights.

It’s something we all should try, don’t you think?

Cross-posted
from the Jerusalem Post with the author permission
.